Hard to believe, but true. Calif tried (but failed, thank God) to repeal its civil rights legislation from its constitution. This could have set a precedence to potentially complicate vaccine mandate exemptions.
There is a new term on the scene of contemporary COVID-19 care, and it is not a good one, “medical tyranny.” This refers to a totalitarian posture taken by doctors, nurses, and hospitals caring for patients with acute COVID-19. The isolation procedure has taken family members and loved ones away from the bedside, and now frightened, ill, and isolated patients through forms of video try to interact with healthcare providers about their inpatient treatment.
There are innumerable reports of long lengths of stay, unhappy patients and family members, and clear evidence of therapeutic nihilism where patients are not offered the full continuum of care that optimally is started as an outpatient. Patients and family members should demand “shared decision making” and enforce a patient bill of rights that ensures all parties agree on the treatment course.
In this program, we have Dr. Richard Amerling, MD, Chief Medical Officer for the American Frontline Doctors, who gives his analysis as it relates to medical tyranny among medical doctors who are entranced into waiting for large, randomized trials and guidelines based upon those trials. Courage, clinical skill, and judgment are qualities associated with outpatient doctors far more than hospitalists when it comes to acute COVID-19. It’s time for hospitals and their doctors to get up to speed
Here are a few examples of the kind of questions that we will address on the program today, and much more:
– How could the Delta variant be more contagious than the original Sars Covid, since variant comes from it? Could it have been manipulated to be more contagious?
– I am a physician in a blue state and am in primary care trying to save patients with early treatment protocols. I heard Dr, McCullough say in his address to AAPS that we should not “die on the hill” for ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. Is there a good protocol for early treatment that does not include these or monoclonal antibodies?
– I would like to know what Dr. McCullough thinks about the possible connection between vaccine side effects and inadvertent intravenous injection of the vaccine?
– Patient gets the Covid vaccine in January. Patient gets a positive Covid test in august. Moderate symptoms and recovered. Does this patient now have robust and long-lasting natural immunity from the infection in august? Similar to a person with natural immunity post-infection without the vaccine? If so, are all these people getting Covid after the vaccine contributing to herd immunity? Can they get reinfected?
– I would like to know if you have or know of an attorney that will file a lawsuit against our company director for MAKING us take the jab! I work at a government lab, and we are being forced to take it or be fired by Nov 15th….. Help!! Please!
‘I believe we, the people, are living now in a version of an abusive relationship with our government. Words I do not use lightly or to cause offence.’ – Neil Oliver
Not simply an infomercial, learn how a very honorable man has treated thousands when we were told to simply stay home & wait for our condition to worsen.
The FDA briefing document is preposterous junk science and it must be withdrawn immediately
Where to even begin with the FDA’s preposterous risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” in children ages 5 to 11?
Let’s start with my bona fides. I have a year of undergraduate statistics at one of the best liberal arts colleges in America (Swarthmore). I have a year of graduate statistics at the masters program rated #1 for policy analysis (UC Berkeley). And I have a Ph.D. in political economy from one of the top universities in the world (University of Sydney). My research focus is on corruption in the pharmaceutical industry so I’ve read scientific studies in connection with vaccines nearly every day for 5 years. Earlier in my career I worked professionally tearing apart shoddy cost-benefit analyses prepared by corporations that were trying to get tax breaks, contracts, and other concessions from local government. Suffice it to say I’ve thought a lot about risk-benefit analysis and I’m better equipped than most to read one of these documents.
March 18, 2021 [Keep this date in mind as you read Campbell’s interview. His words are prophetic.]
Primarily, the plants are acting on the immune system. That’s the system that makes antibodies.
If we were to be consuming this kind of a [plant-based] diet, I suggest we would not need to worry nearly as much about viral disease like we tend to do. So that’s a big deal, because right now many think our only way forward is to get vaccination. Maybe it is in some ways if we don’t do anything else, but I’m saying wait just a second. There’s another way, and it’s likely to be even more effective, not only in the long run, but in the short run.
[…]
This is my suggestion: If they tested positive and they have to wait around for ten days to see what kind of effect they’re going to get, during that time, if they were to change their diet, we might expect they could see benefits very quickly.
[…]
… whether these vaccines have the lifetime that they should have is another question. [Get ready for Campbell’s prophecy. -Ed] The vaccines may work for a few days or weeks or something, two months maybe, but many of them wind down or their efficacy declines. So we don’t know, and we hardly ever know in advance, especially when we rush into something like developing a vaccine, like we’re doing now, quite frankly. And without knowing the longer-term effects of a period of two or five — so I think a vaccine is an interesting technical solution to a problem. It makes sense on one hand, but on the other hand, I’m kind of wondering: Are we putting a Band-Aid on a major wound? Sure, we can see some effects, but I believe it’s up to the individual to make a determination about what they want to do. I do not believe in authoritative methods.