Apr 30, 2024
Every cancer registry in the world is up with new cases and documented rapid progression of disease aptly termed “turbo cancer.” The trendline went up with the rollout of genetic COVID-19 vaccines. What mechanism could explain an injection of Pfizer or Moderna mRNA and the genesis of cancer?
Kyriakopoulos et al have recently published a thorough investigation into the response by regulatory T-cells after encountering repeated injections of foreign mRNA.
Apr 30, 2024
Japan’s Most Senior Oncologist Condemns mRNA Vaccines as “Evil Practices of Science”
As the most senior medical oncologist in Japan, Prof Fukushima has not only led the charge in establishing medical oncology as a key discipline but also pioneered the first cancer outpatient clinic at Kyoto University. His tenure at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and innovative leadership in translating research into actionable medical advancements, notably in pharmacoepidemiology, underscore a career dedicated to challenging the status quo for the sake of improving patient care.
His early critique, published in ‘Nature’ all the way back in 1989, (35 years ago!), highlighted the risks of uncritically accepting and distributing drugs with unproven efficacy, exposing a deep flaw within the pharmaceutical approval process in Japan. This bravery in confronting pharmaceutical norms sparked significant reforms, showcasing his commitment to patient safety over complacency.
Prof. Fukushima highlights an alarming development in oncology known as “turbo cancer,” which has emerged following the use of experimental mRNA gene therapy. It’s important to note that while some “fact checkers” may dismiss “Turbo Cancer” as a nonexistent condition, as Wikipedia has done here, it actually refers to what is medically recognized as Hyperprogressive Disease. Therefore, should you encounter a retarded, bought and paid for fact checker on the term “Turbo cancer,” you can direct them to Hyperprogressive Cancer Disease.
Apr 29, 2024
Hilarious!
June 21, 2023
Atherosclerosis is a blood clot. High cholesterol causes atherosclerosis, becauses it causes RBC’s to stick together and form blood clots. LDL cholesterol is a bridging molecule. Fibrinogen, IgM antibodies & uric acid are all bridging molecules = they stick RBC’s together. Video describes some famous runners & a trainer who had myocardial infarctions despite lots of exercise. Dr Esselstyn doesn’t even require his coronary patients to exercise. Why? What happened during rationing in W-W-1 & 2?
June 23, 2023
Healthy poop is soft, typically like a cow pattie, or at worst, like boiled carrots. Constipated poop is like a tootsie roll or goat pellets. Constipation is an early warning of increased risk of obesity, HTN, diabetes, impotence, coronary artery diseae, HH, GERD, varicose veins, varicocele, diverticulosis, diverticulitis, appendicitis, cholelithiasis, ischemic spine, etc.
Feb 3, 2024
https://youtu.be/vkxnZNYBpR0?si=YH4a8ecgLaJKTrAd
Discover the eye-opening truths about mammography screening from world-renowned experts. This video dives deep into the controversial topic of breast cancer awareness and mammography’s effectiveness. We bring to light the critical insights shared by Peter Gøtzsche, a leading figure in medical research, on why mammography screening might not only be ineffective but potentially harmful to women.
Mammography screening has been a widely recommended practice for early detection of breast cancer. However, recent studies and expert analyses suggest a different narrative. Peter Gøtzsche, alongside our host, discusses the significant flaws in randomized trials of mammography screening, highlighting the biases and the lack of reliable evidence supporting its benefits. They explore the physiological reasons why mammography fails to detect cancer early enough to make a difference, emphasizing the systemic nature of breast cancer and the misleading statistics that have propagated its use worldwide.
The conversation sheds light on the alarming fact that mammography screening does not lead to earlier cancer detection or reduce breast cancer mortality rates. Instead, it raises concerns about the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of cancers that would not have impacted a woman’s health within her lifetime. This critical examination calls for a reevaluation of mammography screening practices and advocates for more honest and gender-equitable healthcare recommendations.
00:00 – Introduction
02:30 – The Mammography Debate Unveiled
04:19 – Peter C. Gøtzsche’s Mammography Screening Studies
08:47 – The Biological Reality of Breast Cancer
15:15 – Questioning the Status Quo: Are We Overdiagnosing?
18:26 – The Psychological Impact of False Positives
21:22 – Are We Wrongly Looking for Cancers?
31:13 – The Two Big Lies of Mammography Screening
36:17 – Preventing Breast Cancer: Beyond Screening
37:13 – Empowering Patients in the Screening Conversation
39:38 – Outro