EXERCISE:
* Jog 5k outdoors
* Hike in desert
* Lift biceps, triceps, shoulders
WATER: (3) × (25) = 75 oz
EATS:
* leftover Moroccan stew (add vitamin C powder) w/ avocado toast – outdoors in sunshine 🌞
* few almonds, small XL-icee, few XL-chips & jr mint
* SUN HAS SET
Cmmt: XL indicates uncommon extravagantly luscious food
Sep 18, 2021
QUESTION:
Can anyone point me to the strongest studies and papers on the following:
1) Evidence that vaxxed are more/less contagious than unvaxxed?
2) Evidence that vaxxed are experiencing more/less severe illness than the unvaxxed?
Apologies if some of this is covered in your paper, or feel free to tell me to go and do my research- its just im hoping someone can point me in the right direction as you are closer to this than I am.
With thanks,
Cal
Sep 18, 2021
Hi Cal,
I’ll go through my files and see what I can find but for starters, here’s information that shows all the vaccines reduce the risk by < 2%.
Dr. Ronald Brown’s analysis reports the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines reduce the risk of infection by .7% and 1.1%, respectively, (the absolute risk reduction measure, ARR). The FDA, Pfizer and Moderna did not disclose the ARR to the public, ignoring the FDA’s reporting guidelines. I reviewed Pfizer’s clinical trial data and confirmed his numbers.
https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199/htm#B11-medicina-57-00199
Two more articles confirm the ARR for all the vaccines is < 2%.
A study published in The Lancet also confirms all the Covid19 vaccines’ ARR is <2%.
Pfizer .9%
Moderna 1.4%
J&J 1.8%
AstraZeneca-Oxford 1.9%
Gamaleya (Sputnik V) 1%
“Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness – the elephant (not) in the room”
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
Peter Doshi, BMJ Assoc. Editor also writes Pfizer’s clinical trial data’s absolute risk measure is less than 1%.
The Lancet and Doshi’s articles’ ARR is slightly different from Brown’s because they used interim clinical trial data and Brown used the data Pfizer and Moderna submitted to the FDA for authorization of their shots under an EUA. This article explains absolute risk reduction (ARR) vs. relative risk reduction (RRR).
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/absolute-vs-relative-risk/
Dr. Brown explains the ARR vs RRR in this vidoe interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkwn5I8tLmE
Vaccine risks:
Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV virus, says the death curve follows the vaccination curve.
Salk Institute study shows the spike protein causes the most damage separate from the virus.
Spike Protein circulating in the blood of fully vaccinated healthcare workers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
Dr. Charles Hoffe video illustrates the damage the mRNA vaccines do to the body.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uD98ksu0PzQg/
I think one reason why people like your cousin believe the vaccine is the only solution, is because they are unaware that there are so many safe generic drug protocols.
This video about Ivermectin not only provides studies supporting it, but it also highlights the corruption that censored it.
This website provides extensive information about the safe generic treatments and the studies backing them.
Dr. Peter McCullogh has given countless interviews.
Drs. Harvey Risch, George Fareed, and Peter McCullough testify before the U.S. Senate about early outpatient treatments as an essential part of Covid19 Solution.
Dr. Harvey Risch article on Hydroxychloroquine
Sep 23, 2021
Cal,
The reason why the vaxxed still get Covid is because:
1) all the shots have an ARR <2%, so they do not provide any protection. This is directly from the vax manufacturer’s clinical trial data and the articles I provided confirm this.
2) there is antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) risk in all the shots.
People think those who die from Covid, are killed by the virus. But actually, it’s the immune system’s over reaction to the virus (cytokine storm), which creates hyper inflammation in the body. ADE, through a process called pathogenic priming, occurs when the antibodies generated during an immune response recognize and bind to a pathogen, BUT they are unable to prevent infection. Instead, these antibodies are like a Trojan horse where they allow the pathogen to get into cells and worsen the immune response.
This was evident in past vaccine animal studies for SARS CoV-1. Vaccinated mice and ferrets developed antibodies. But when they were exposed to the wild virus, they had a hyper inflammatory response. The mice developed lung inflammation and the ferrets developed hepatitis/liver failure and had to be euthanized. This is why a SARS CoV vaccine never successfully made it past animal trials, because the vaccines made the disease worse.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler (Jack) warned that any SARS CoV-2 vaccine could put the vaccinated at risk for more severe disease if they were later exposed to the virus, a variant, or another coronavirus (e.g. common cold), or a future SARS CoV-3, etc. I read his excellent article about pathogenic priming which summarized the past failed animal trials and warned about ADE, which he referred to as disease enhancement or immune enhancement. I reached out to Jack on LinkedIn and thanked him for writing this paper. He said he hoped it would wake people up to the risks. LinkedIn later shut down his account but I saved an archived copy of his article.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/notice-clinicians-regulatory-agencies-vaccine-via-may-lyons-weiler/
Here’s an interview with Jack about the disease enhancement risk (ADE).
https://dryburgh.com/james-lyons-weiler-coronavirus-vaccine-safety-warning/
Fauci even warned in a press conference that a vaccine could make the disease even worse. But he said this can be observed in animal trials. However, they skipped animal trials. https://youtu.be/ZrWAqpPGAxQ?t=183
There is a study about Informed Consent that focused on ADE risk. This NIAID funded study (Fauci is the Director of the NIAID) published Oct. 28, 2020, said vaccine clinical trial participants were not properly informed of the ADE risk, which is “non-theoretical and compelling” where the vaccinated could experience “severe disease, lasting morbidity or even death” but would otherwise have a mild case if unvaccinated.
The authors said the ADE risk was so important, that it warranted a separate Informed Consent form. Despite this recommendation, none of the Informed Consent forms I have read mentions ADE risk.
Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the core technology platform for the Covid19 shots said, “Antibody enhancement is the vaccinologist’s worst nightmare. That the product that you worked so hard to create actually causes worse disease.”… “We have the flawed clinical studies, I acknowledge that they’re far from perfect and some might say designed to not be able to detect certain types of adverse events. Specifically, one thing they were not designed to detect is antibody dependent enhancement. And that’s recognized by the FDA because in the FDA authorization letter for Emergency Use Authorization, they specifically say that the data are not sufficient to rule out antibody dependent enhancement; it remains a significant risk and suggested to the vaccine companies that they should do follow on clinical studies to detect the presence or absence of antibody dependent enhancement. But they didn’t insist that the vaccine companies do that.” Malone says the vaccine companies decided to take a pass and not investigate whether or not antibody dependent enhancement would occur. He said, “What we do know is the distribution of virus levels, load, whether it’s measured by PCR cycles or some measure that correlates more directly to titer, in the vaccinated is at least as high, those vaccinated that have ‘breakthrough’ infections, that become infected, is at least as high as in the unvaccinated and to my eye, it looks like there’s suggestions that there may be a subset of patients that have been vaccinated and infected, that have even higher levels of viral replication than are present in the unvaccinated population. That, if that was to hold true, that would be the smoking gun demonstrating antibody dependent enhancement.”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jHcDEhJgn3y6/
As for the Delta variant, it’s not more severe, if you mean deadly. Viruses mutate and become more transmissible but less virulent/deadly because they want to survive and not kill the host (Virology 101). The media is hyping the Delta variant and lying when they say it’s more severe or deadly. I haven’t even heard lying Fauci say it’s more deadly. That’s probably because he knows he doesn’t have to. He knows the public will equate “more transmissible” with more deadly so that’s all he needs to repeat, is how much more transmissible the Delta variant is and the complicit media fuels this fear mongering propaganda by saying ICUs are at capacity, more children are being hospitalized, etc.
On the 18th, I shared the most recent U.K. Public Health Report that showed the Delta variant’s case fatality rate (CFR) is .4% and the original virus’ case fatality rate was 1.1%. So this confirms the Delta variant is far less virulent/deadly. And the infectious fatality rate is always lower than the CFR because it includes asymptomatic and mild cases, which largely go undocumented.
Delta variant CFR per U.K. reports
August 6 .2%
August 20 .3%
Sept 3 .4%
Sept 17 .4%
You can see that the CFR has risen over time. As I previously mentioned, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and others have warned that the mass vaccination programs will create more virulent variants due to ‘vaccine leaking’ or ‘vaccine escape.’ On the other hand, Dr. Michael Yeadon (former Pfizer Chief Science Officer) considers this immune escape claim as fear mongering and said it’s an “evil trick” to push “top ups” (boosters). It’s hard to tell if the rising CFR supports Vanden Bossche’s theory but in my opinion, the rising CFR points to the ADE risk and the high vaccination rate in the U.K.
Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV virus, says the death curve follows the vaccination curve. He also says that the vaccinated are creating variants that are resistant to the vaccine. However, that’s not the same as what Vanden Bossche is asserting, that the new variants are more virulent.
U.K. Public Health Dept Reports: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-novel-sars-cov-2-variant-variant-of-concern-20201201
U.K. Sept. 17th report:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018547/Technical_Briefing_23_21_09_16.pdf
A study finds the current Covid19 vaccines will cause ‘Vaccine Induced Enhanced Disease’ when infected with Delta:
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/16/study-finds-covid-19-vaccines-will-cause-vaccine-induced-enhanced-disease/
I disagree that it is best to vaccinate the vulnerable. Given the ADE risk and the cytotoxic spike protein, under no circumstances should anyone receive these shots. There is zero benefit and 100% risk, both short term and long term. While some may argue that the viral vector DNA shots (J&J and AstraZeneca) are better because they do not use mRNA or the harmful lipo nano particles, they aren’t aware that these shots also instruct the body to create the spike protein. The viral vector DNA shots simply go about it in a different way.
Instead of directly injecting the mRNA into the body, the J&J/AstraZeneca shots inject the DNA, which enters the vaccinated person’s cells and makes its way into the nucleus where the person’s DNA is stored and it transcribes their DNA into the mRNA. From this point, the J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines work exactly the same as the mRNA vaccines. The newly created mRNA leaves the nucleus into the cell’s cytoplasm and there a ribosome will translate this genetic material, the mRNA, into the spike protein. The cell will produce numerous spike proteins, which will protrude from the surface of the cell wall. A Salk Institute study published in May (which I shared in my previous email), showed these spike proteins alone (spikes on the surface of the virus cells) cause damage separate from the virus cell. So all the Covid19 shots instruct the body to produce the cytotoxic spike protein.
Dr. Charles Hoffe explains to journalist Laura Lynn the damage the vaccines do once injected; someone created this compelling 9 min. video that illustrates what occurs.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uD98ksu0PzQg/
Dr. Ryan Cole (pathologist) explains the vaccine damage to the brain, heart and other organs using photos from an autopsy of a vaccinated person.
Project Veritas released a video of whistleblower Jodi O’Malley, an RN for the U.S. Dept of Health & Human Services, who reveals secret video footage of how vaccine injuries are not being reported to VAERS. The staff will lose their jobs if they are allowed to administer Ivermectin. Dr. Maria Gonzales, ER Doctor for the U.S. Health & Human Services said “The government doesn’t want to show the darn vaccine is full of shit.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obdI7tgKLtA
Whistleblower Deborah Conrad, a hospitalist physician’s assistant, reports vaccine injuries are not being reported to VAERS and the more severe Covid cases are among the vaccinated. https://rumble.com/vmncez-these-patients-deserve-to-be-heard-vaers-whistleblower.html
If these videos don’t convince someone how incredibly dangerous these vaccines are, then it’s best to walk away.
There is no talking sense into those who refuse to have an open mind. The evil that is behind this is too much for many to comprehend. Their Denialism prevents them from suspecting any malfeasance by those they blindly trust to protect their health. So if you present the irrefutable facts and they still cling to their beliefs, it’s time to move on. I am focusing all my efforts in trying to help people avoid the vaccine mandates and inform others about the risks if they are willing to listen.
Even though it’s stressful and as you said, a very uncomfortable experience, for all of us who see what’s going on, ignorance is not bliss, it can be deadly. The future suffering the vaccinated may face from the shots will be many times worse than the anguish we all feel from knowing what we know.
Despite this angst, I consider it a huge blessing to be awake to all this madness and to be part of this amazing group, thanks to Dr. McCullough. The tireless work he and other members are putting forth to save lives and create a better future is why I am convinced that we will ultimately win this global battle. I foresee a huge paradigm shift in how healthcare will be delivered and it will not be served by big pharma. The globalists have overplayed their hand and awakened a sleeping giant. You know what they say about Karma. It will be biblical and I predict the tide will turn soon. Tick-Tock.
Communications here are for informational purposes only and are NOT meant to be on the record or for press purposes or medical advice.
Following video is from JUNE 2021:
Following video is from FEB 14, 2021
Our visit to NEW EARTH WELLNESS RETREAT https://newearthwellness.org/
First, we will summarize our findings, and then, we will explain them in detail. References will be placed at the end.
Abstract
Background Much research shows that blood calcidiol (25(OH)D3) levels correlate strongly with SARS-CoV-2 infection severity. There is open discussion regarding whether low D3 is caused by the infection or if deficiency negatively affects immune defense. The aim of this study was to collect further evidence on this topic.
Conclusions The two datasets provide strong evidence that low D3 is a predictor rather than a side effect of the infection. Despite ongoing vaccinations, we recommend raising serum 25(OH)D levels to above 50 ng/ml to prevent or mitigate new outbreaks due to escape mutations or decreasing antibody activity.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.22.21263977v1