



August 2022
Human prion protein and prion-like protein misfolding are widely recognized as playing a causal role in a large and growing number of neurodegenerative diseases. Here we summarize the compelling evidence that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 contains extended amino acid sequences previously established as characteristic of a prion-like protein. This suggests that vaccine-induced spike protein production is synonymous with production of a prion-like protein, and we trace some of the various pathways through which these proteins should be expected to traverse and distribute throughout the body. We describe some of the highly concerning biological consequences that would be expected to occur with increased frequency as a consequence. Specifically, we describe spike-protein contribution, via its prion-like properties, to neuroinflammation and neurodegenera-tive diseases; to clotting disorders within the vasculature; to suppressed prion protein regulation in the context of widely prevalent insulin resistance; and other health complications it could be expected to induce. We explain why these prion-like characteristics are more relevant to vaccine-related mRNA-induced spike proteins than natural infection with SARS-CoV-2. We conclude with some potentially ominous public health implications and recommendations for investigations of these possibilities.
This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary
August 20, 2022
https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/civil-surgeons/covid-19-technical-instructions.html
CDC:
“If an applicant refuses one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine series that is medically appropriate for the applicant, it should be documented that the vaccine requirements are not complete and that the applicant refuses vaccination. This applicant is Class A and is inadmissible to the United States.”
August 20, 2022

As promised in the prior substack publication entitled “Data doesn’t lie: mRNA-vaccines and correlation to all-cause mortality”, Dr. Schetters has now provided a more comprehensive analysis and disclosure of the data which he briefly disclosed during our prior podcast.
Below [is link to] copies of the slides in this current presentation, I will let Theo draw the conclusions.
Aug 18, 2022
From Prof H Risch
Professor of Epidemiology at Yale opines on the recent announcement of reforms at the CDC
CDC announced that the institutes have done an external/self-study and proposed a makeover “to restore public trust.” Dr. Walensky said that she “plans to remake the culture to help the agency move faster when it responds to a public health crisis. She also wants to make it easier for other parts of the government to work with the CDC, and wants to simplify and streamline the website to get rid of overlapping and contradictory public health guidance.”
Everything except the fundamental problem that she and the external reviewer are blind to: industry subservience and epidemiologic incompetence.
CDC has published numbers of fatally flawed study reports over the last two years in MMWR, its captive journal. No amounts of “moving faster” will fix this problem. It took CDC two years to figure out that the vaccines are not an effective public health tool for reducing infection spread, something that I and numerous colleagues have been saying for more than a year. CDC has still not recognized that for Covid, masks are useless, that distancing is useless, that general population testing is virtually useless for managing the population pandemic. That the CDC has reviewed itself and only found trivialities and not the systematic problems that caused it to produce repeatedly failing policies shows that this review exercise was only window dressing. It was not a serious review.
The CDC needs a completely different independent external review to understand how it as a public health agency with MD and PhD epidemiologists could get so much science wrong for so long. The current makeover plans are ludicrous, will fool no one, and will not restore any of the large amount of public trust that has been lost by its poor performance over the last 2.5 years.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/brownstone.org/articles/cdcs-ludicrous-makeover/amp/?espv=1
Aug 18, 2022
Posted by Alexandra Latypova, a former pharmaceutical industry executive who reviewed nearly 700 pages of documents Moderna submitted to the FDA as part of its application process:
The math clearly doesn’t add up: 225 mcg of the active mRNA substance in a vial equals to 50 mcg in a 5-dose vial and 38 mcg in a 6-dose one.
The explanation of this apparent mystery is that the mRNA injection ingredients are specified by weight while the dose administration is by liquid volume. No direct translation is possible. At the injection administration site, the untrained and unsupervised vaccinators who, no doubt, will be thrown under the proverbial bus first when this scam fully unravels, are involved in the last phase of mRNA product manufacturing – the making of the individual doses, outside of any possibility of quality control by the pharmaceutical company. If you are wondering if this violates the FD&C Act – yes, it does. This is like the illicit drug dealers cutting cocaine by hand in a basement lab, however, much less precise.
August 18, 2022
A “40% [increased death rate] is just unheard of.”
https://thevigilantfox.substack.com/p/that-should-have-went-down-life-insurance
July 23, 2022
https://joelshirschhorn.substack.com/p/very-best-supplement-to-prevent-covid
August 17, 2022
[ AP in Italics; James’ Comments in Bold ]
NEW YORK (AP) — The head of the nation’s top public health agency on Wednesday announced a shake-up of the organization, saying it fell short responding to COVID-19 and needs to become more nimble.
Top public health agency? Says who? Evidently FDA no longer has much to say about what CDC recommends?
More at this link: