April 5, 2022
Month: December 2021
How will people react to COVID revelations? (Neil Oliver and Bret Weinstein)
June 6, 2022
Bret speaks with Neil Oliver about the COVID Better Way Conference 2022 in Bath and on their experiences throughout the pandemic. Neil Oliver is a British television presenter, archaeologist, and author. He is best known as the presenter of several documentary series on archaeology and history, including A History of Scotland, Vikings, and Coast. He is also an author of popular history books and historical fiction.
Find Neil Oliver at: https://twitter.com/thecoastguy https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnVR…
The full podcast episode is available on Spotify and YouTube: https://youtu.be/0ytv1pzjiSw https://open.spotify.com/episode/3A05…
Professor Ehud Qimron: ‘Ministry of Health, it’s time to admit failure’ – Open Letter
Jan 13, 2022
Professor Ehud Qimron, head of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Tel Aviv University and leading Israeli immunologists, has written the following open letter, originally published on Israel’s Channel 12 News:
Ministry of Health, it’s time to admit failure (read letter at this link).
Athletes Dropping, Record Life Insurance Deaths: On a Clear and Convincing Basis, It’s Because of the Vaccines
June 12, 2022
The Bradford Hill Criteria for Causality Confirm
Is there a large signal? Yes, an astronomical number of deaths.
Is there a temporal association? Yes. It turns out that 80% of these deaths occur within a week. 50% will occur within a couple of days.
Is it internally consistent? Are there near-misses? Yes. Blood clots, heart attacks, myocarditis, and so on.
Is it externally consistent? Yes. Record life insurance deaths and a record number of athletes dying on the field.
Do randomized trials affirm? Yes. More deaths in Pfizer’s vaccine group than in the placebo.”
Dr. Peter McCullough: “On a more probable than not basis, and probably on a clear and convincing basis, the vaccines are causing the death of people who take them.”
The Science Is Settled for Now on COVID-19 (Dr. Harvey Risch, Yale)
June 14, 2022
Harvey Risch MD, PhD—one of the most informed, experienced, and respected researchers in the field of COVID-19—describes the science as he believes it is generally settled at this point. It looks little like the science proclaimed by Anthony Fauci, the CDC, the FDA, and the rest of the COVID-19 establishment.
Dr. Risch addresses the treatment of COVID-19, the future of the pandemic, and the vaccines.
Most interesting, as I interview Dr. Risch, it becomes one of the few times you will hear two well-informed, highly published physician-scientists disagreeing on some fundamental issues surrounding COVID. It’s a good, refreshing experience for people who want to think as deeply as possible, and to make up their own minds, about the real science surrounding COVID-19.
Injected but ‘unvaccinated’ – Distortion that covered up trail of destruction
June 14, 2022
CDC study lists various outcomes by vaccination status. Unless one looks carefully at the small print at the bottom, one would assume that “unvaccinated” means those who received no injections when in fact, as stated at the bottom, “unvaccinated” means they either received no injections or received the first dose within the last 14 days.
More at this link:
Kids get three viruses at time as COVID measures harmed immune system
June 14, 2022
Kids get three viruses at time as COVID measures harmed immune system
Long, Stringy, Rubbery Blood Clots: “We’re Seeing This a Lot”
June 12, 2022
Dr. Ryan Cole: “There are studies by Dr. [Resia] Pretorius out of South Africa that show that you can take the spike protein alone, without platelets in the plasma, and that spike protein alone causes the proteins in our blood to clump. That spike protein is thrombogenic; it causes clots, and it causes a lot of clots.”
Let’s tag team this until everybody understands
July 13, 2022
The modified spike protein is dangerous and for very specific reasons.
Here’s a vial of these raw clots, washed [free] of blood and preserved, before staining. These structures that were evacuated from inside blood vessels during embalming procedures within hours of death.
Unlike normal clots which are gelatinous, almost jelly-like, these so-called “clots” contain extremely large, complex, repeating structural elements (all shown in link below) that are clearly being constructed in the blood of the victims who died from these clots.
I believe these structures may very well explain why so many seemingly healthy adults are suddenly dying.
The pathologist doesn’t know what these are. The embalmers don’t know what these are. But they know what they are not.
So, now us non-embalmer laymen can rest assured that these strange white fibrous proteinacious structures are not blood clots. The structures did, however, obstruct the flow of blood in the arteries of these individuals and likely is what killed them.
In conclusion, they are not “blood” clots. They are structures in the blood. They are “structural clots” or “fibrous clots” that are extremely large and are being constructed inside the body over time.
My grave concern is that every person who has been injected with mRNA instructions may be constructing these fibrous structures inside their bodies at this very minute, and that it’s only a matter of time before they block major arteries or cause heart attacks, strokes or other acute causes of “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS).
PLEASE CLICK THIS LINK FOR DETAILS:
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/lets-tag-team-this-until-everybody?utm_source=email&s=r
Dr. Jessica Rose is a Canadian researcher with a Bachelor’s Degree in Applied Mathematics and a Master’s degree in Immunology from Memorial University of Newfoundland. She also holds a PhD in Computational Biology from Bar Ilan University and 2 Post Doctoral degrees: one in Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and one in Biochemistry from the Technion Institute of Technology. She was also accepted for a 2-month program as a senior researcher at the Weizmann Institute prior to completion of her latest post doctoral degree at the Technion. Her more recent research efforts are aimed at descriptive analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data in efforts to make this data accessible to the public.
Bret Weinstein: I will be vindicated over Covid
June 6, 2022
Freddie Sayers sits down to discuss the pandemic response with biologist Bret Weinstein. Before the pandemic, evolutionary biologist and former Evergreen professor Bret Weinstein was lauded by both sides of the political divide for his insights into the crisis on American campuses. As a member of the so-called ‘intellectual dark web’, Weinstein was expanding his audience and being profiled by legacy media like the New York Times. Then the pandemic began and his heterodox perspective suddenly fell out of favour, even with many of his erstwhile allies. Advocating for alternative treatments for Covid, questioning the efficacy of the global vaccine programme and challenging narratives of the pandemic came at a cost. Without warning, the Dark Horse podcast was demonetised on YouTube and Weinstein was forced to split from the views of his former friends and supporters. So, how can we seek truth in such divided times? Freddie Sayers invited Bret into the UnHerd studio in London to try to understand what his views really are.
Read the supporting article: https://unherd.com/thepost/bret-weins…
Listen to the podcast version: https://shows.acast.com/lockdowntv-wi…
// TIMECODES // 00:00 – 01:31 – Introduction 01:31 – 04:43 – What have we learnt about the state of the world, post-pandemic? 04:43 – 06:26 – What mistakes were made? 06:26 – 12:31 – Is this pandemic response we experienced, going to become the norm? 12:31 – 14:34 – What does Bret see as the disaster in the pandemic response? 14:34 – 17:50 – Was it worthwhile vaccinating younger people? 17:50 – 22:22 – Were there darker forces at play when it came to the vaccination programme? 22:22 – 24:48 – Bret discusses the ‘Better Way conference’ he attended 24:48 – 28:33 – What is the worst case scenario behind the pandemic response? 28:33 – 31:14 – In a few decades time, will we see a generation with a decreased lifespan? 31:14 – 39:11 – Bret’s opinion on The Pandemic Treaty 39:11 – 43:30 – What is down the road for us? Will there be a new pandemic? 43:30 – 45:36 – What’s in store for Bret? 45:36 – 47:29 – Is the worst still yet to come? 47:29 – 48:11 – Conclusion