Norman Fenton interviews John Campbell with Jessica Rose

May 27, 2023

John Campbell has become a major youtube celebrity during the covid era, and his views have changed dramatically over the 3 years. This has resulted in both praise and criticisms from both ‘sides’ of the narrative. Here John talks about how he became an internet sensation and also answers some tough questions about his changing views.

Discussion also includes Norman Fenton & Jessica Rose.

Anti-Mandate Actress Running For NYC SAG-AFTRA President!

July 19, 2023

Namakula is a New York City-based actress who has appeared in a range of productions, including TV shows like Inventing Anna, The Blacklist and New Amsterdam. She opposed the industry-imposed vaccine mandates and is now fighting back by running for the position of New York president of SAG-AFTRA. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger talk to Namakula about her acting work and union candidacy.

Visit Namakula’s website: https://www.namakula.com/ Namakula on Twitter: https://twitter.com/namakula7

The New York Times has lost its mind. And by mind, I mean principles and understanding of the First Amendment.

July 21, 2023 by Alex Berenson

This failure may not be news to you, but take it easy on me – I worked there 10 years, I almost got killed in Iraq for them (yes, true, don’t ask details). I’m having a tough time with this betrayal.

You may have heard that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified yesterday at a Congressional hearing about censorship.

But unless you read the New York Times, you probably did not see how the Times – the world’s most important newspaper, the outlet that sets the agenda for ALL non-conservative media – covered the hearing:

Its guiding principle is that governments and companies DO NOT DETERMINE WHAT IT WRITES, and that, aside from imminent national security risks (and I mean imminent, like the location of a terrorist bomb in Manhattan), it has an absolute right to publish without prior restraint.

That used to be its guiding principle, anyway.

Today the Times prefers to be a quasi-official arm of the biomedical security state.

[Continue reading at this link…]

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-new-york-times-has-lost-its-mind?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=363080&post_id=135338439&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

After Long Silence on ‘Long Vax,’ Science Magazine Links Autoimmune Disorders to COVID Shots

July 6, 2023 by Brenda Baletti, PhD

Scientists hesitantly speak out

“You see one or two patients and you wonder if it’s a coincidence,” Anne Louise Oaklander, M.D. Ph.D., a neurologist and researcher at Harvard Medical School, told Science. “But by the time you’ve seen 10, 20,” she continued, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/long-vax-science-magazine-autoimmune-disorders-covid-shots/

COVID-19: Newly Published Research and CDC Data

The truth sets people free

July 20, 2023 by Dr. Robert Malone

Recently, there have been a couple of interesting papers published concerning mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. These are papers that for some reason haven’t made it to main-stream media. Let’s take a look.

[…]

In plain language, 5.6 in 1000 people had a stroke after vaccination within a 21 day period. The J&J product was associated with more strokes than the Pfizer or Moderna products. Those who were vaccinated with concurrent COVID-19 infections had an increased risk of either type of stroke.

[…]

This study again highlights the role of natural immunity in infectious disease. That breast milk confers immunity to the newborn. Something we have known forever but somehow forgot during COVID-19. [Neverthless, the experimental, ineffective & untested vaccine was recommended & pressed upon this pharmaceutically vulnerable age group.]

[,,,]

Concentrating on the pediatric population (kids)…

In babies and kids up to four years old, only 0.6% are fully vaccinated. About 5% have completed the primary series and 9% to 11% have had at least one dose.

The 5-11 year olds also are no longer getting vaccinated. Less than 5% have had a booster and only 33% have completed the 2-shot series.

It is believed that not being able to do extracurricular activities without vaccination, caused the 12-17 year olds to get vaccinated. But the good news is that only 8% have been boosted.

Frankly, these numbers are extraordinary. Parents are no longer vaccinating with this experimental vaccines.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/covid-19-newly-published-research

Ex Pfizer VP: mRNA Makes Body A “Spike Protein Factory” w/ Dr. Michael Yeadon (plez wait for video countdown)

July 19, 2023

Dr. Michael Yeadon was a vice president at Pfizer, but now he has a dire warning about their mRNA vaccines: “the clinical trials were fraudulent… the very design of them could not have been more dangerous… your bodies are turned into a spike protein factory.”

After deviating from the CDC-preferred narrative about COVID-19, Dr. Yeadon was promptly vilified by his peers and harassed until he left social media. He shares his insider account LIVE with Dr. Drew and Dr. Kelly Victory.

Dr. Michael Yeadon was a vice president at Pfizer, chief scientist, and allergy and respiratory researcher for 16 years. He was the cofounder of biotech company Ziarco which sold to Novartis in 2017 for over $325 million. He received a PhD from the University Of Surrey.

“This Jewess Says RFK Jr is Right” (concerning Covid comment)

July 19, 2023

It’s legacy media hysteria time again: news outlets from The Washington Post to The Atlantic hyperventilate about what they spin as the latest scandale. Presidential candidate RFK Jr made comments at a dinner about ethnically targeted bioweapons. Mainstream media commentators claim that these comments are in themselves anti-Semitic.

Click link BELOW to read her response:

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/this-jewess-says-rfk-jr-is-right

Latest Pfizer Documents Reveal Highly Suspicious Deaths and Hospitalizations in the Clinical Trial Data

July 19, 2023

As you know from prior updates, the attorneys who represent ICAN also represent the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the FDA to obtain Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine documents. After a historic win, the FDA was forced to produce tens of thousands of documents every month. 

The latest July batch of documents consists of case report forms (CRFs) of 212 individuals who participated in Pfizer’s clinical trial and some are highly concerning. 

Ten participants whose reports were produced in this tranche experienced highly concerning health events. All the adverse events (AEs) listed below happened after receipt of the vaccine (either the individual was in the original vaccine group or was vaccinated after the unblinding of participants who had originally been in the placebo group). 

  • An approximately 70-year-old man was hospitalized with atrial fibrillation, pulmonary emboli (blood clots in the lungs), and occlusive thrombus (blood clot) in his right calf just 2 days after his first injection despite no prior medical history of cardiovascular issues as confirmed by Pfizer. Pfizer indicated the blood clots were due to “Prolonged travel in the car.”
     
  • An approximately 49-year-old man with high cholesterol, but no other related health issues, had a myocardial infarction (heart attack) 11 days after his second dose, which apparently caused a biking accident. It appears that he was hospitalized for 16 days. Pfizer reported it as “not related” to the vaccine and, instead, stated it was “related to cardiovascular risk.” Also of interest is Pfizer’s observation that his two doses were more than 21 days apart, but yet it is not clear that this was recorded as a medication error. Notably, no reactogenicity e-diary information was collected for this subject despite this being part of the clinical trial protocol (to collect a diary of symptoms experienced after injection). 
     
  • An approximately 48-year-old man reported that his partner was pregnant two and a half months after his second dose. His partner suffered a miscarriage three weeks later. But, as you can see in the records, Pfizer’s primary concern appeared to be figuring out whether the partner was also in the study and, if so, ensuring this adverse event was reported only once. Again, no reactogenicity e-diary information was collected for this subject.
     
  • An approximately 70-year-old male with a history of heart and kidney disease was hospitalized with atrial fibrillation and acute kidney injury 12 days after his second active dose. The individual inputting the AE information into his CRF actually admits to making up the cause of adverse events. When questioned why “dehydration” was listed as the cause of the acute kidney injury, the clinical trial staff member eventually admits that dehydration was “what the PI [Principal Investigator of the trial] thought [the kidney injury] could be attributed to, but dehydration is not in the medical record for this instance and was not reported by the patient.” Again, no reactogenicity e-diary information was collected for this subject.
     
  • An approximately 68-year-old man was hospitalized with atrial fibrillation just 1 week after his first dose. He had hypertension and dyslipidemia (high cholesterol), but no other related health issues. No reactogenicity e-diary information was collected for this subject.
     
  • An approximately 68-year-old man committed suicide just 4 days after receiving his first dose of the vaccine (after having received two doses of placebo five months earlier). While he did have a history of depression, the study criteria excluded participants with recent or active suicidal ideation/behavior, and comments in his CRF indicate that Pfizer checked his history for “suicidal attempts or recent hospitalization due to depression” and found none.
     
  • An approximately 85-year-old man with a history of heart disease died suddenly of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease two months after his second injection. In reporting this adverse event, one Pfizer employee wanted to confirm if the toxicity grade “should be 5 as the AE was Fatal.” Another employee responds, “Toxicity grade should be 5-Fatal, but 4 is the highest radial that can be selected.” It’s not entirely clear what this means. No reactogenicity e-diary information was collected for this subject.
     
  • An approximately 85-year-old man with a history of heart problems, among numerous other health issues, was hospitalized with worsening aortic stenosis (a heart issue) 15 days after his first injection and died of cardiac arrest 10 days later. Once again, no reactogenicity e-diary information was collected for this subject.
     
  • An approximately 56-year-old woman with a history of heart disease, including congestive heart failure, diabetes, a stroke in 2019, and numerous other health issues, was hospitalized with worsening coronary heart disease 11 days after her first dose. Records indicate her “end of participation was 28 Aug 2020. Subject withdrawn due to SAE [serious adverse event] no longer meets the eligibility requirement of inclusion 3,” which required “healthy participants.” Evidently, this individual’s 2019 stroke, diabetes, and history of heart failure was not considered enough to disqualify her as unhealthy, but worsening heart disease, which occurred right after the vaccine, was. Predictably, her adverse event was marked “not related” to the vaccine and, instead, was absurdly attributed to “Hypertensive cardiovascular disease or arteriosclerotic heart disease.” In other words, her worsening heart disease was caused by heart disease.
     
  • An approximately 54-year-old man was hospitalized with heart failure 26 days after his second dose. He recovered but ended up back in the hospital six weeks later, where he ultimately died of congestive heart failure. Despite the trial inclusion criteria which required that participants be deemed “healthy,” this man had a number of serious health issues prior to the study, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acid reflux, heartburn, bilateral leg edema, hypertension, irregular heartbeat, a defibrillator implant, idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and congestive heart failure, but was still allowed to participate in the study.

As you may have already guessed, despite the fact that most of them suffered heart damage, which is a widely-known side effect of the vaccine, Pfizer determined that none of these events were related to the investigational vaccine. And let’s not forget that FDA had access to all of these records before granting licensure. 

Pfizer’s trial included over 43,000 people but, to date, FDA has produced only 785 case report forms for less than 2% of the trial participants.  If and when more are produced, ICAN will continue to update our supporters.