May 7, 2022
‘Is someone out there using Orwell’s work as an owner’s manual?’ says Neil Oliver
May 7, 2022
‘Is someone out there using Orwell’s work as an owner’s manual?’ says Neil Oliver
March 25, 2022
May 26, 2022
“COVID-19 rebound has been reported to occur between 2 and 8 days after initial recovery and is characterized by a recurrence of COVID-19 symptoms”
March 4, 2022
In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”
The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. A media onslaught against the medicine ensued. What were Dr Hill’s reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?
One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame.
May 25, 2022
May 23, 2022
CNN just ran a piece explaining that “scientists are urgently trying to solve” the question of whether the endless waves of Covid we now have “may be a result of the mRNA technology used to build some Covid-19 vaccines.”
Not making this up:
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-the-pandemics-wrongest-man/comments?s=r
May 24, 2022

The military is only allowed to mandate vaccinations that are FDA approved, and not merely authorized for emergency use. This was widely known and contributed to the FDA’s decision to approve the COVID vaccines sooner than the original two-year waiting period.
After the FDA’s approval, in August 2021 the DoD mandated that all military personnel be vaccinated using vaccines that are fully licensed by the FDA.
However, the DoD did not exclusively use the newly approved Pfizer vaccine, named Comirnaty, but also offered the original unapproved version of Pfizer’s vaccine.
The DoD stated that the two vaccines can be used “interchangeably for the purpose of vaccinating Service members.”
This was the point that LT Bill Moseley used in his defense in front of the Navy’s administrative board hearing. Specifically, the Navy mandate was unlawful since the vaccines they were providing were not FDA approved.
[…]
This distinction between using “authorized” vs “approved” COVID vaccines for the U.S. military was the subject of a letter from Sen. Ron Johnson to the Biden administration back in October 2021.
It remains unclear why the DoD is still offering unapproved COVID vaccines to military personnel despite it being a violation of the mandate and the military code.
(Con’t at this link)
https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/us-navy-lieutenant-wins-battle-against-vaccine-mandate
May 23, 2022
We are threatened with the loss of our education/career for not participating in an experimental injection… and we are not allowed to know assuredly what it contains? Madness.