Oct 12, 2021
The federal public health response can find no bottom in terms of miscalculation, ineptitude, and inability to recalculate or recalibrate. History will judge, and science always is self-correcting, and eventually, the clouds will clear on the issues of suppression of treatment to promote mass vaccination. The show this week has a focus on weighing risks and benefits and medical judgment.
We are fortunate to have Dr. Michael Huang, a family physician from Northern California who has been treating outpatients and critically ill patients from the very beginning with sequenced combination therapy to reduce the risk of death. He is also using his medical judgment to guide on the decision for vaccination. When he advises against COVID-19 vaccines, then his patients can use that professional decision in support of medical exemption from mandatory vaccination. Finally, we have Ms. Kim Witczak, who has this excerpt from her professional website:
“From the heart-shattering loss of my husband due to an undisclosed side effect of an antidepressant, I sought change. I decided to become an advocate for pharmaceutical drug safety and reform. I never wanted anyone else to go through what I went through, to have to ask after a pharma-related tragedy, “How come I didn’t know this?! To be clear, I’m not anti-drug; I’m pro-information. A 25-year career in advertising and marketing has taught me all about the art of persuasion (and even, manipulation) to get what you want. It’s also shown me how to connect the dots, in this case, between Washington, the FDA, Big Pharma, Patient/Disease Awareness organizations, and the healthcare system.”
Kim gives her perspectives to The McCullough Report as one of the most experienced public citizens in the U.S.; has testified in Washington on drug safety over 50 times.