Month: December 2021

Published Oct 31, 2003

[ Interesting read from nineteen years ago… ]

Scientists have created a highly lethal virus in an effort to develop stronger protections against supervirulent forms of smallpox that terrorists might turn on humans, researchers said yesterday.
The genetic engineering involved a virus known as mousepox, which infects mice but is not known to hurt people. Into that virus the scientists spliced a single gene that made it superlethal, then tested it on mice treated with different combinations of a smallpox vaccine and drugs.
The scientists said the results showed that the best defenses proved quite effective in preventing deadly disease not only in mice, but probably in humans exposed to customized smallpox of similar design.
This type of research has been debated for years, with critics arguing again yesterday that superviruses created in laboratories could inspire terrorists to create their own deadly diseases. The mousepox scientists countered that the research could help deter terrorism by demonstrating the emergence of more potent medical defenses.
The mousepox research was done at St. Louis University as a project financed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases meant to find new protections against smallpox, which kills one in three victims.

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE READING

May 17, 2022

Kim Iversen reacts to Stephen Colbert’s Covid diagnosis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an EUA for the emergency use of Paxlovid for the treatment of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults and pediatric patients with positive results of direct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral testing, and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death. The 5-day treatment course of PAXLOVID should be initiated as soon as possible after a diagnosis of COVID-19 has been made, and within 5 days of symptom onset. Should a patient require hospitalization due to severe or critical COVID-19 after starting treatment with PAXLOVID, the patient should complete the full 5-day treatment course per the healthcare provider’s discretion. According to clinical trial data, Paxlovid had an 89% reduction in the risk of hospitalization and death. The CDC says the risk for covid increases steadily as you age, and it’s not just those over the age of 65 who are at increased risk for severe illness.

May 7, 2022

‘Is someone out there using Orwell’s work as an owner’s manual?’ says Neil Oliver

May 26, 2022

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/05/prominent_vaccinologist_says_covid_pandemic_is_about_to_get_ugly.html

March 25, 2022

https://etana.substack.com/p/vaccinated-women?s=w

May 26, 2022

“COVID-19 rebound has been reported to occur between 2 and 8 days after initial recovery and is characterized by a recurrence of COVID-19 symptoms”

https://palexander.substack.com/p/cdc-now-admit-officially-problems?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MDU1MDcwMCwicG9zdF9pZCI6NTY2Njc2NDUsIl8iOiJWREVkdiIsImlhdCI6MTY1MzU4MTg5NiwiZXhwIjoxNjUzNTg1NDk2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTc5MzU2Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.fDNHAlnL6QuV3hgPryQcsVBgz1XQaOZfJqxt4oRdwAU&s=r

March 4, 2022

In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.

But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”

The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. A media onslaught against the medicine ensued. What were Dr Hill’s reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?

One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame.

May 25, 2022

May 23, 2022

CNN just ran a piece explaining that “scientists are urgently trying to solve” the question of whether the endless waves of Covid we now have “may be a result of the mRNA technology used to build some Covid-19 vaccines.”

Not making this up:

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-the-pandemics-wrongest-man/comments?s=r

May 24, 2022

The military is only allowed to mandate vaccinations that are FDA approved, and not merely authorized for emergency use. This was widely known and contributed to the FDA’s decision to approve the COVID vaccines sooner than the original two-year waiting period.

After the FDA’s approval, in August 2021 the DoD mandated that all military personnel be vaccinated using vaccines that are fully licensed by the FDA.

However, the DoD did not exclusively use the newly approved Pfizer vaccine, named Comirnaty, but also offered the original unapproved version of Pfizer’s vaccine.  

The DoD stated that the two vaccines can be used “interchangeably for the purpose of vaccinating Service members.” 

This was the point that LT Bill Moseley used in his defense in front of the Navy’s administrative board hearing. Specifically, the Navy mandate was unlawful since the vaccines they were providing were not FDA approved.

[…]

This distinction between using “authorized” vs “approved” COVID vaccines for the U.S. military was the subject of a letter from Sen. Ron Johnson to the Biden administration back in October 2021.

It remains unclear why the DoD is still offering unapproved COVID vaccines to military personnel despite it being a violation of the mandate and the military code.

(Con’t at this link)

https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/us-navy-lieutenant-wins-battle-against-vaccine-mandate