Breast Cancer & Mammography’s Dark Side!

Feb 3, 2024

https://youtu.be/vkxnZNYBpR0?si=YH4a8ecgLaJKTrAd

Discover the eye-opening truths about mammography screening from world-renowned experts. This video dives deep into the controversial topic of breast cancer awareness and mammography’s effectiveness. We bring to light the critical insights shared by Peter Gøtzsche, a leading figure in medical research, on why mammography screening might not only be ineffective but potentially harmful to women.

Mammography screening has been a widely recommended practice for early detection of breast cancer. However, recent studies and expert analyses suggest a different narrative. Peter Gøtzsche, alongside our host, discusses the significant flaws in randomized trials of mammography screening, highlighting the biases and the lack of reliable evidence supporting its benefits. They explore the physiological reasons why mammography fails to detect cancer early enough to make a difference, emphasizing the systemic nature of breast cancer and the misleading statistics that have propagated its use worldwide.

The conversation sheds light on the alarming fact that mammography screening does not lead to earlier cancer detection or reduce breast cancer mortality rates. Instead, it raises concerns about the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of cancers that would not have impacted a woman’s health within her lifetime. This critical examination calls for a reevaluation of mammography screening practices and advocates for more honest and gender-equitable healthcare recommendations.

00:00 – Introduction
02:30 – The Mammography Debate Unveiled
04:19 – Peter C. Gøtzsche’s Mammography Screening Studies
08:47 – The Biological Reality of Breast Cancer
15:15 – Questioning the Status Quo: Are We Overdiagnosing?
18:26 – The Psychological Impact of False Positives
21:22 – Are We Wrongly Looking for Cancers?
31:13 – The Two Big Lies of Mammography Screening
36:17 – Preventing Breast Cancer: Beyond Screening
37:13 – Empowering Patients in the Screening Conversation
39:38 – Outro

Book review “Overdiagnosed” by Gilbert Welch MD

April 24 2024, review by Peter Rogers, MD

Lots of screening studies are over rated like chest CT for lung cancer, PSA for postate cancer, bone mineral density, cardiac calcium CT, colonoscopy, mammography for women less than 50 yo, etc.

Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health https://a.co/d/0Y5NAar

Produce Without Pesticides – Consumer Reports

Apr 18, 2024

Fruits and vegetables are listed alphabetically in the chart at the link below, showing the risk from pesticides in their conventional and organic forms, as well as when they are grown domestically or imported.

Click here, then scroll to the chart:

https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/produce-without-pesticides-a5260230325/

PS Be sure to also review how to wash produce to remove some of the pesticides. It’s best to adhere to buying organic from the list of the DIRTY DOZEN, while enjoying either organic or conventional from the list of the CLEAN  15:

https://projectwaistline.com/?p=37878

Type 2 Diabetes  Warning over common food additives

Apr 24, 2024

READ THE LABELS

It’s often said, “Do not eat any packaged food with more than a couple of ingredients”, or “If you cannot pronounce it, do not eat it”. But in this case there is no need to guess. These are the offending additives:

Carrageenans (E407): 3% increased risk per 100 mg per day

Tripotassium phosphate (E340): 15% increased risk per 500 mg per day

Mono and diacetyltartaric acid esters of mono and diglycerides of fatty acids (E472): 4% increased risk per 100 mg per day

Sodium citrate (E331): 4% increased risk per 500 mg per day

Guar gum (E412): 11% increased risk per 500 mg per day

Gum arabic (E414): 3% increased risk per 1000 mg per day

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13343991/health-warning-common-additive-diabetes-emulsifiers.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton